Interesting Chuck commentary, plus other stuff
Friday, 22 January 2010 16:38Chuck vs. Half the Human Race by Abigail Nussbaum (via
cofax7)
I'm not sure I agree entirely with her conclusions (I don't, for instance, see Anna having been less geeky than Jeff, Lester, or Morgan, and I think she dismisses Jill's geekery too quickly; she swerves right past the General as if she doesn't exist) but her analysis of Sarah and Ellie is pretty spot on.
Also,
halfamoon is ramping up. (A fourteen day celebration of female characters in fandom.) Prompt post is open until February 13; posting is the last two weeks in February, and the minimums are ridiculously low. (100 words text, single icon, etc.)
Can I just say, though, that I'm really over The Good Wife assumption: if you like women characters, you'll be watching The Good Wife? No, no, I won't. The Good Wife is everything I hate in television: it's about mature, heterosexual adults facing their problems in grown up and responsible ways* that do not involve spaceships, vampires, or other speculative fiction set dressing. I don't watch that show when it's about dudes, I'm not going to watch it to see Christine Baranski as a not particularly fabulous bitch**. (Julianna Margulies does exactly zero for me, Archie Panjabi seems like someone I'll enjoy watching in some other show entirely, one with werewolves, quirkiness, or violent criminals being apprehended by wily detectives.)
*AFAICT, the people being irresponsible on this show are not held up as lovable examples of awesome slackeriness or budding master criminals, but just losers who need to grow the fuck up. So not my scene.
**I watched, like, an episode and a half? If that's not the essence of her character, I still don't care, because she's got a smaller role than Margulies or Punjabi. Also, SNAG is not a look that I appreciate on Josh Charles.
I'm not sure I agree entirely with her conclusions (I don't, for instance, see Anna having been less geeky than Jeff, Lester, or Morgan, and I think she dismisses Jill's geekery too quickly; she swerves right past the General as if she doesn't exist) but her analysis of Sarah and Ellie is pretty spot on.
Also,
Can I just say, though, that I'm really over The Good Wife assumption: if you like women characters, you'll be watching The Good Wife? No, no, I won't. The Good Wife is everything I hate in television: it's about mature, heterosexual adults facing their problems in grown up and responsible ways* that do not involve spaceships, vampires, or other speculative fiction set dressing. I don't watch that show when it's about dudes, I'm not going to watch it to see Christine Baranski as a not particularly fabulous bitch**. (Julianna Margulies does exactly zero for me, Archie Panjabi seems like someone I'll enjoy watching in some other show entirely, one with werewolves, quirkiness, or violent criminals being apprehended by wily detectives.)
*AFAICT, the people being irresponsible on this show are not held up as lovable examples of awesome slackeriness or budding master criminals, but just losers who need to grow the fuck up. So not my scene.
**I watched, like, an episode and a half? If that's not the essence of her character, I still don't care, because she's got a smaller role than Margulies or Punjabi. Also, SNAG is not a look that I appreciate on Josh Charles.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 22:22 (UTC)But, hey, not your beautiful cake. No big deal.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 22:53 (UTC)I just get a little bit tired of the promotion of The Good Wife as the antidote to the Where Are the Female Characters? problem.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 23:40 (UTC)Oh, I totally get it. Also, there shouldn't be just one show where all the female characters are, either!
Okay, Castle has four female characters, but half of them are purely domestic and one of those is mostly played for laughs.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 23:02 (UTC)That made me grin. And yeah.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 23:25 (UTC)Uh, yeah, I did do that, didn't I? My only defense is that the general is not so much a character as a plot generator, but you're right that she deserved a mention. (As for Anna, I agree that she started out pretty geeky, but that mostly went away when she hooked up with Morgan.)
As for The Good Wife, I sympathize with both your points, in that I really have no interest in lawyer shows and am continually surprised at how hooked I am by this one (though at least part of the appeal is the ongoing story of the main character's husband's incarceration and possible framing, which certainly breaks the lawyer show mold) and I much prefer shows with vampires, spaceships, etc. But name me one current genre show that doesn't make you want to scream with frustration at its genderfail (for that matter, name me one current genre show that isn't stultifyingly boring or really badly made). I agree that it's frustrating, but if you want interesting female characters on TV today, The Good Wife is pretty much your only port of call.
That said, I like that the show is about adult characters dealing with adult problems (and is not a soap opera) because that's pretty rare, and as I mention in my post, even the best female characters of the last couple of decades were for the most part either girls or girlish. That's nice, but maybe because I'm no longer a girl myself, I'm interested in other perspectives.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-23 01:52 (UTC)Fringe. Criminal Minds.
Of course, your mileage may vary.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-23 12:28 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-23 13:12 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-23 01:13 (UTC)As for swerving past General Beckman well, women over 40 are invisible, you know.
Actually, I've been bombarded with ads for Cougar Town while watching the Australian Open so I'll change that to women over 40 are invisible unless being held up to sexual ridicule.
Also, do not have Yvonne Strahovski or General Beckman icon upoaded! Disaster!
no subject
Date: 2010-01-23 04:05 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-23 04:11 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-23 15:14 (UTC)But then again, I haven't really heard that term used since the early '90s, so mayhaps the definition has evolved. *g*