[
http://books.google.com/books?id=Wl7Akm-Se9wC&dq=nomad+ayan+hirsi+ali&source=gbs_navlinks_s] I finished this book a little over a week ago, and I'm sort of at a loss for what to say.
The first thing is that I'm really not the audience for this book. I'm reading about religions in order to figure out what to incorporate into my own religious practice, and this book is a warning to the liberal, Enlightened West (capitals deliberate) about the Great Muslim Horde. (Horde is going a little further than Hirsi Ali, but not by much.)
She really does propose Christianity as a solution to the problems Islam presents to global stability and the freedom of women, not because she believes in Christianity, but because it's a religion that has already figured out how to co-exist with (and, to an extent, promote) concepts like individualism, human rights, political freedom, and other founding ideas of a liberal, democratic polity; i.e. the Protestant Reformation/Vatican II happened and they have been assimilated into Christian approaches to religious community. Also, it has a global infrastructure in place that could challenge the spread of Wahabi schools of thought with both money and ideas.
I am not convinced that Christianity, as it is practiced outside of Europe, is the liberalizing force she envisions — witness the struggles of the Anglican Communion and the Dominionist Christianity of the Americas. If her goal is something like a Reformation, it seems as if, instead of pushing Bibles at Muslims, we should be pushing both the Quran in translation and, well, Unitarian/Ethical Humanist/Jewish traditions of wrestling with the text and coming to one's own conclusions.
I'm also a little skeptical of the way she conflates African and Arabic practices with Islamic practice. I wonder if the bad things she experienced in her Muslim family or observed in immigrant African and Arabic Muslim families in Europe reflect Muslim practice in Indonesia or Turkey or the Balkans, which are large areas of Muslim practice which have a different tribal history as the basis of their Islam, which may have had different cultural results. (Although, I have to do this wondering with the thought that she might possibly be right and, until and unless Islam goes through its own Reformation, being an observant, orthodox Muslim (part of an observant Muslim community?) leads to a pre-modern world view.)
I question all of these things knowing full well that Hirsi Ali would condemn me for moral, um, turpitude, or at least a moral complacency, because there are clearly some Islamic communities which have beliefs and practices which are currently and physically harming women. I don't think we should discount her insight into that, and also her insight into how profoundly ignorant about operating in a society with regularized and regulated institutions like banks and credit cards and mail order catalogues and public schools and freedom of religion and, however anemic, popular political rule. While I don't think we should require immigrants to share our cultural beliefs (first of all, we'd have to agree on what those beliefs are), she does make me feel like we need to do a lot better job at teaching immigrants about how cultural
institutions work.
I, of course, have no idea how to do that, without imposing culture on
people. :/